Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Police raid Twitter user's home to find out who posted anti-mayoral tweets

Takeaway ... take care what you post on Twitter? The government is watching.

A mayor in Peoria, Ill., who reportedly ordered police to raid the home of a Twitter user who sent out 50 or so parody tweets that painted the politico in a poor light -- mocking that he used drugs and hung with prostitutes -- is now facing a First Amendment backlash.

"I find it very troubling," said Angela Campbell, a professor at Georgetown University Law School, in Fox News. "It chills people's First Amendment rights to criticize officials … whether it's through parody or just calling somebody a jerk."

Meanwhile, Aaron Caplan, a professor at Loyola Law School on the end other of the continent, in Los Angeles, said similarly: "This absolutely raises concerns from me. Under the Constitution, you can criticize people in power. It's how you can tell the difference between a democracy and a police state. And you can do it through humor," Fox News reported.

Their comments focus on recent actions of Peoria Mayor Jim Ardis and his local police force.

A Twitter user created an account named @Peoriamayor about nine weeks ago, and subsequently sent out dozens of tweets about the mayor, parody style. Twitter suspended the account in mid-March, Fox News reported.

About a week before its suspension, the account was actually labeled a parody account. But police -- reportedly acting under the order of Mr. Ardis -- issued a warrant against the suspected Twitter parody poster and raided the suspect's home, the Star Journal of Peoria reported. The accusation was that the suspect, who is not named in the report, was actually unlawfully trying to impersonate a public official.

One resident at the home told the local newspaper that police seized the suspect's computers and smart phones to try and determine the name of the Twitter account holder, Fox News reported. Police also reportedly brought three people who were at the home during the raid down to the station for questioning. Two others who live in the home were contacted in person by police at their places of work and taken to the station for interrogation, Fox News reported.

A Peoria Police Department official later told Fox News that one of the residents was arrested for possession of marijuana.

Still, First Amendment legal minds say the execution of a search warrant for a Twitter post is troubling. Ms. Campbell said the charge of unlawfully impersonating a public official -- which is only a misdemeanor anyway, that carries a maximum $2,500 fine and one year in jail -- doesn't even seem to apply in this case. That law, she said, to Fox News, is aimed more at keeping people from impersonating police officers.

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

US Postal Service, NOAA latest federal groups to buy up ammo

Why is the postal service buying ammunition? ...

You can add the U.S. Postal Service to the list of federal agencies seeking to purchase what some Second Amendment activists say are alarmingly large quantities of ammunition -- and, for the most part, for reasons unknown.

In late January, the USPS posted this notice on its website under the heading of "Assorted Small Arms Ammunition," Solicitation Number 3CD-14-A-0009: "The United States Postal Service intends to solicit proposals for assorted small arms ammunition. If your organization wishes to participate, you must pre-register … This message is only a notification of our intent to solicit proposals."

The bigger question, of course: Why?

"We're seeing a highly unusual amount of ammunition being bought by the federal agencies over a fairly short period of time," said Alan Gottlieb, chairman of the Washington-based Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. "To be honest, I don't understand why the federal government is buying so much at this time."

It's not just the USPS. 

A little more than a year ago, the Social Security Administration put in a request for 174,000 rounds of ".357 Sig 125 grain bonded jacketed hollow point" bullets, the online solicitation read. Before that, it was the Department of Agriculture, requesting 320,000 rounds. And more recently, the Department of Homeland Security sparked widespread concern over its desire for 450 million rounds -- at about the same time the FBI separately sought 100 million or so hollow point rounds.

"We realize that the House is still investigating the ammo purchases by the administration, but from what we've seen so far, most representatives don't seem alarmed," said Erich Pratt, director of communications for Gun Owners of America. "For example, Rep. Lynn Westmoreland said that given all the agencies that the Department of Homeland Security purchases for, '450 million rounds really isn't that large of an order.'"

Perhaps. The Department of Homeland Security employs in its various law enforcement entities -- from the Coast Guard to the Secret Service to Customs and Border Protection -- more than 200,000 workers, an estimated 135,000 of whom are authorized to carry weapons. And when the agency makes its ammo buys, it often does so over the course of several years, rather than in a one-stop shop bulk buy.

"The government agencies are still putting out contracts and getting them fulfilled," said Jake McGuigan, director of state affairs for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, in the context of discussing ammunition shortages on store shelves. "There's still a little bit of that … I think DHS or Customs has a 10-year contract" or five-year contract, so their ammunition orders for tens of thousands of rounds are actually spread out over the course of several years.

But that doesn't really explain away the SSA's ammo buys -- or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's request for 46,000 rounds. Or, the Department of Agriculture's purchase of 320,000 rounds in 2011, including 50,000 to fit a 9 mm and 120,000 for a 40 cal. Or, the Department of Education's buy -- way back in 2010 -- of 27 Remington Brand Model 870 police 12-gauge shotguns, as reported by The Washington Post.

As Philip Van Cleave, president of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, asked: Why exactly does a weather service need ammunition?

"NOAA -- really? They have  a need? One just doesn't know why they're doing this," he said. "The problem is, all these agencies have their own SWAT teams, their own police departments, which is crazy. … In theory, it was supposed to be the U.S. Marshal's that was the armed branch for the federal government. Now they all have their own SWAT teams."

Only they're not called SWAT -- they're called the offices of investigative service, or the offices of inspectors general, or some other equally bureaucratic sounding name. For instance, regular Internal Revenue Service tax agents aren't equipped with on-the-job guns -- but those affiliated with the agency's Criminal Investigations Division are. That goes for workers with the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, with the Department of Agriculture's Office of Inspector General and with the Department of Education's Office of Inspector General, too. The Energy Department, the Health & Human Services agency, the Commerce Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development, i.e. USAID -- they're just a few of the federal entities that boast an armed division, tasked with investigating fraud and suspected criminal activities. As such, the agents get to carry guns. 

"Most of these agencies do have their own police forces," said Jim Wallace, executive director of the Massachusetts-based Gun Owners' Action League. 

And that, perhaps, more than federal ammunition purchases, is the larger issue, he suggested. Van Cleave agreed.

"What's the need for that? Do we really need this? … That was something our Founding Fathers did not like and we should all be concerned about," Van Cleave said, speaking of the seeming expansion of police forces throughout all levels of government.

Still, most gun-owning Americans in recent months have been more focused on the sharp reality of the federal government's buys than on constitutional considerations: Store stocks of ammunition have dried. 

The reasons for the empty shelves were two-fold, McGuigan said. First, widely reported federal ammunition purchases sparked conspiracy-type fears among gun-owners, who worried the federal government was trying to crack down on Second Amendment rights via the back door, he said. And second, the Obama administration's stated desire to scale back gun rights in part drove more in the private sector to purchase firearms -- which, in turn, fueled ammunition sales, he suggested.

"Over the last few years, there's been a tremendous increase in gun ownership, [with] many more females," McGuigan said. "I think a lot of people need to be aware of what's happening … and what the federal agencies are doing. I don't think, though, they need to be overly concerned that there's not going to be any ammo left."

Not all are so willing to dismiss the possibility the federal government has a Second Amendment smack-down in the works with all its ammo buys, however. After all, it's the federal Environmental Protection Agency that just shut down the last smelter plant in the nation, via regulatory crackdown. And it's the EPA, joined by the FBI, that just swarmed into USA Brass manufacturer in Montana, closing the plant for a day or two for unspecified reasons. The notion of an Obama administration using backdoor means to achieve a personal agenda of scaling back gun ownership -- an agenda that's hardly been kept secret -- doesn't seem that outlandish to some.

"I don't believe in conspiracy theories, but it doesn't make a whole lot of sense," said Gottlieb. "The amount of ammunition they're buying up far exceeds their needs. It far exceeds what they'll use -- they'll never use it all."


Saturday, April 12, 2014

Militias head to Nev. rancher's standoff with feds: We're not 'afraid to shoot'

Nevada standoff heats ...

Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy's decades-long battle against the federal government over grazing rights has heated to the point where militia groups have joined in and taken up spots against the feds who've circled his land -- and talk is, they're not afraid to open fire.

A spokesperson for the one of the militia groups said as much to local 8 News Now: I'm not "afraid to shoot," he said.

The tension is tight, to put it mildly.

Margaret Houston, Mr. Bundy's sister and a cancer survivor, said at a town hall gathering this week that the situation "was like a war zone" and that she felt "like I was not in the United States," The Daily Mail reported. And the Las Vegas Review-Journal described it this way: "Serious bloodshed was narrowly avoided," in a story about how dogs were unleashed on a woman who was pregnant while the son the rancher was hit with a taser.

On Tuesday, armed Bureau of Land Management agents stormed Bundy's property, escalating a court dispute that's wound for two decades over the rancher's refusal to pay for grazing fees. Bundy's view is that he owns his property -- that it's been in his family's hands for centuries -- and he doesn't have to pay for his own 900-head of cattle to graze on the 600,000 acre Gold Butte property. The government, meanwhile, says the land belongs to them and agents have swooped and circled, closing off roadway access to the property and flying helicopters overhead the family's home.

Following the agent occupation, one of Bundy's sons, Ammon Bundy, was tasered by a federal official to the point that blood seeped through his shirt, video showed. And Houston, meanwhile, said she was roughed up and man-handled by authorities, telling town hall attendees that she was "hit from the back, it was like a football tackle" and that "they just took me and threw me down to the ground," The Daily Mail reported.

BLM, for its part, says the situation only turned violent when protesters who rallied to the family's defense kicked a K-9 unit officer.

Now militia groups are on the scene, promising to help the Bundy's keep up the fight.

"This is what we do, we provide armed response," said Jim Lordy, with Operation Mutual Aid, to the local broadcast station. "They have guns. We need guns to protect ourselves from the tyrannical government."

Lordy also said "many more" militia groups are coming to the site to join in the Bundy family defense.

"They all tell me they are in the process of mobilizing as we speak," said another member, to the Review-Journal.


Thursday, April 10, 2014

Sen. Rand Paul on ex-IRS head Lois Lerner: Choose -- testify or jail

Sen. Rand Paul said it's not complicated, former IRS head Lois Lerner has a quick and clear decision to make -- either testify, or go to jail.

"You know, contempt is something you can go to jail for," he said, Newsmax reported. "And it doesn't happen often. In fact, I'm not sure if we ever had someone go to prison for a contempt order, but it is something that has a significant penalty. So she will have to decide -- is she going to risk going to jail, or testify in a truthful manner?"

His statements come as the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is voting on whether or not to hold the former IRS official -- who is a key figure in the federal agency's alleged targeting of tea party groups -- in contempt of Congress.

She could face imprisonment, depending on how the vote goes -- and Paul isn't alone in his view that Congress shouldn't pull punches with her.

House Speaker John Boehner said on Monday that "somebody at the IRS" should go to jail, and vowed that the House would find her in contempt.

Lerner retired from her position but now collects a government pension, Newsmax reported.

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Armed agents surround Nevada ranch over cattle dispute; seize son



Federal agents bearing machine guns have swooped onto a Nevada rancher’s property, surrounding his home and forcibly removing his cattle – a chaotic and aggressive escalation to a public-private standoff that’s raged for 20-plus years.

Cliven Bundy has refused to pay grazing fees for his cattle since 1993, embarking instead on a “one-man range war” against the Bureau of Land Management, court documents reported by the Washington Free Beacon showed. Bundy’s view: I’m not paying fees for my cattle to graze on land that’s been owned by my family for centuries.

So he’s battled it out with BLM in court for more than two decades. But apparently, the government decided enough was enough.

“What’s happened the last two weeks, the United States government, the bureaus are getting this army together and they’re going to get their job done and they’re going to prove two things. They’re going to prove they can do it, and they’re [going to] prove that they have unlimited power and that they control the policing power over this public land. That’s what they’re trying to prove,” Bundy said, to the Washington Free Beacon.

He also said the federal authorities had unleashed a range of military-type equipment – everything but tanks and rocket launchers, he said, the Washington Free Beacon reported.

His wife, Carol, meanwhile said 200-plus armed agents from both the BLM and the FBI have taken up spots around their property line. An estimated eight helicopters are also circling, she said.

“We’re surrounded,” she said, in the news outlet. “We’re estimating that there are over 200 armed BLM, FBI. We’ve got surveillance cameras at our house, they’re probably listening to me talk to you right now.”

A spokesperson for the National Park Service denied that armed federal agents had been tasked with taking the couple’s cattle. But she did confirm that “security” agents had been sent to the scene, in response to what she claimed were threats made against the officials – she described them as contractors -- who removed the cattle.

Meanwhile, Cliven’s son, Dave Bundy, has been taken into custody on State Road 170, a portion of highway that was closed at the federal authorities’ requests, the Washington Free Beacon reported. A BLM spokesperson said Dave Bundy was detained and taken because he failed to comply with numerous federal agent requests to “leave the temporary closure area on public lands,” the media outlet reported.

Friday, April 4, 2014

Conservatives launch boycott of Mozilla after gays press CEO to quit

Conservative activist Ben Shapiro is leading up an online charge of fellow political compadres to boycott the browser Firefox — an outraged response to the Mozilla chief's departure from his CEO role due to gay rights' protests.

Former CEO Brendan Eich, who's been with Mozilla since its creation and actually helped found the company's charitable offshoot foundation in 1998, announced this week he's stepping down from the role over a flap generated by a $1,000 donation he made to a California campaign that sought to ban same-sex marriage in the state.

Eich made the donation five years ago, but his promotion to CEO brought the issue to the forefront once again. And the ensuing outcry from the gay rights crowd and certain Mozilla employees on social media ultimately pushed him to abandon the leadership post.

But now conservatives are striking back.

Shapiro has started a movement — complete with petition — to get as many Internet users as possible to "uninstall or cease using Mozilla," he wrote on his website, TruthRevolt.org, replacing his traditional news content with simply the call-to-arms, Raw Story reported.

"Pardon this interruption of your TruthRevolt experience," the message continued. "Mozilla recently forced its CEO, Brendan Eich, to resign over his personal support for traditional marriage. The firing followed a vicious smear campaign against Eich by dating website OKCupid, in which OKCupid blocked Mozilla users from visiting their website."

Shapiro was referencing how OKCupid last week, in attempt to sway public opinion against Eich, disallowed anybody using the Mozilla Firefox browser from accessing their online dating services.

Eich donated $1,000 to support Proposition 8 in California.

Thursday, April 3, 2014

FBI seizes artifacts from Indiana collector, age 91, who says they're legal

The FBI has swooped into an elderly man's Indiana home and seized thousands of artifacts he collected — he says legally — during his decades of travel to hundreds of destinations, including Haiti, Australia, New Guinea and Peru.

Donald Miller, 91, accumulated the artifacts over the past 80 years, said FBI Special Agent Robert Jones, during a news conference.

"The cultural value of these artifacts is immeasurable," Jones said, at the same time refusing to disclose any details about what the FBI took, Fox News reported.

Miller told CBS, meanwhile, that he "absolutely" has the right to own all his artifacts, although he's cooperating with the FBI's investigation.

"I have been in 200 countries collecting artifacts," he said, Fox News reported.

It's not clear if the FBI has charged him with anything. But agents stormed his home and seized his artifacts — some of which they claim he acquired improperly, Fox News said. Video showed that agents set up a command vehicle and erected numerous tents over Miller's property, which had the effect of largely shielding their activities from public view.

Miller, meanwhile, said he obtained many of his artifacts before laws were on the books addressing them. Federal agents are reportedly going to reunite some of the pieces with their original owners, he said, Fox News reported.

Experts and laypersons alike were impressed with what he's amassed through the years.

"I have never seen a collection like this in my life except in some of the largest museums," said Larry Zimmerman, a professor of anthropology and museum studies and one of the the experts who was called in to help agents to catalog the collection, Fox News reported.

And one neighbor, Andi Essex, said she saw part of Miller's collection a few years back and that it contained "crazy stuff" like a full skeleton that "blew my mind," AP reported.

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

U.S. Catholics take to border to press and pray: Obama, please let illegals stay

Catholics led by Cardinal Sean O'Malley of Boston took their recent Mass to the Arizona-Mexico border to stage a transnational prayer event aimed at pressing President Obama to hold back on deportations and thus, save lives.

Roughly 300 attended, including bishops from across the West and Southwest, The Los Angeles Times reported. The main message of the mass: To honor those who died while trying to cross into the United States illegally.

The event was just the latest Catholic Church try to get Obama to use his executive authority — including his pen to sign executive orders — to keep deportations of illegals at a few and far between figure, The Los Angeles Times said.

Pro-immigrant activists have dubbed Obama the "deporter in chief" for what they say is his tendency to send illegals packing — an accusation that isn't born out by federal statistics, however. Recent numbers show that the number of deportations among Mr. Obama have fallen by more than 40 percent since he first took office
.
But the Catholic Church is keeping up the charge, nonetheless
.
O'Malley first laid a wreath at the border wall in Nogales, and then made an emotion-filled statement: "We know the border is lined with unmarked graves. They call them illegal aliens. We are here to say they are not forgotten. They are our neighbors. Our brothers. Our sisters. ... You cannot love God without loving your neighbor," The Los Angeles Times reported.